Singh v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.3d 435 · 2003
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably Lanza v. Ashcroft (2004), Cadet v. Bulger (2004)
26 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Li Chen Zheng v. Ashcroft · Singh v. Ilchert · Leticia Cordon-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here shall be no judicial appeal or review of any action, decision, or claim raised under the Convention [Against Torture] . . . except as part of the review of a final order of removal pursuant to section 242 of the [Immigration and Nationality] Act”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“discretion to determine whether an aggravated felony conviction resulting in a sentence of less than five years is a particularly serious crime”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and except as provided in the regulations [the Secretary of State promulgates pursuant to the Act], no court shall have jurisdiction to review the regulations adopted to implement this section, and nothing in this section shall be construed as providing any court jurisdiction to consider or review claims raised under the [CAT] or this section, or any other determination made with respect to the application of the policy set forth in subsection (a), except as part of the review of a final order of removal pursuant to [ 8 U.S.C. § 1252 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garcia v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.