Mojias v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.3d 606 · 2003
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Ortiz v. McBride (2004), Abbas v. Dixon (2007)
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Snider v. Melindez · Neal v. Goord · Alred Lewis v. The State of New York · Schlesinger Investment Partnership v. Fluor Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nless it is unmistakably clear that the court lacks jurisdiction, or that the complaint lacks merit or is otherwise defective, we believe it is bad practice for a district court to dismiss without affording a plaintiff the opportunity to be heard in opposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abbas v. Dixon“When determining whether an administrative remedy is available, courts ■'should be careful to look at the applicable set of grievance procedures.'’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[The PLRA] clearly does not require a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies that do not address the subject matter of his complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.