Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F.3d 919 - Laws v. Aa Lamarque

Laws v. Aa Lamarque’s Empirical Analysis

351 F.3d 919 · 2003

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021 · most notably Roy v. Lampert (2006), Bills v. Clark (2010)

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

510200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houston v. Lack · Godinez v. Moran · Maleng v. Cook · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Massey v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause [petitioner] ... made a good-faith allegation that would, if true, entitle him to equitable tolling,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rather, our cases require only that there be “circumstances consistent with petitioner’s petition ... under which he would be entitled to a finding of an ‘impediment’ under § 2244(d)(1)(B) or to equitable tolling” for further factual development to be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “required to file any remaining federal petition for which [he was] otherwise eligible within one year of AEDPA's effective date, that is, by April 24, 1997.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.