Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 FSUPP 279 - Evans v. Lawson

Evans v. Lawson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
4
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2005

4 state decisions

201972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · St. Amant v. Thompson · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Rosenblatt v. Baer · Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule seems to be that when the comment upon which the action is based is one of qualified privilege, then the question is not whether the charge is true or false, but only whether the privilege has been abused to the extent that there exists actual malice, or an utterance with knowledge of its falsity, or a complete and utter disregard for its truth or falseness." Evans v. Lawson (Va. 1972), 351 F. Supp. 279, 285 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.