351 F. Supp. 2d 295 - Bryan v. Shah’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]his case does not appear to turn on whether defendants knew that a patient taking lithium is at risk of suffering from lithium toxicity if regular lab tests are not performed; this case does appear to revolve around whether medical orders were adhered to and whether Defendants followed up with the Plaintiff after the orders were given.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 456 N.J. Super. 278 - Cowley v. Virtua Health Sys.

2. “[w]hile laypersons are unlikely to know how often insulin-dependent diabetics need insulin, common sense -- the judgment imparted by human experience -- would tell a layperson that medical personnel charged with caring for an insulin-dependent diabetic should determine how often the diabetic needs insulin.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 456 N.J. Super. 278 - Cowley v. Virtua Health Sys.

3. “twice failed to obtain blood tests to monitor Lithium levels, which tests were twice ordered by the physician[,]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 456 N.J. Super. 278 - Cowley v. Virtua Health Sys.