Brucato v. Ezenia! Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Fire Insurance Ass'n v. Wickham · 2 E.H. Smith 326 - Nassoiy v. . Tomlinson · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a person in good faith tenders an instrument as full satisfaction of an un-liquidated or disputed claim and the instrument or an accompanying written communication contains a “conspicuous statement” to the effect that the instrument is tendered in-full satisfaction of the claim, the claim is discharged if the claimant obtains payment on the instrument and does not tender repayment within ninety days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.