Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F. Supp. 2d 529 - Betterton v. Evans

351 F. Supp. 2d 529 - Betterton v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a description of the device and the changes which may be made in the device; (2) a description of the preclinical trials (if any) of the device ...; (3) a description of the clinical trials (if any) of the device ... ; (4) a description of the methods to be used in, and the facilities and controls to be used for, the manufacture, processing and, when relevant, packing and installation of the device; (5) an identifying reference to any device; (6) if appropriate, specimens of the labeling proposed to be used for the device; (7) such other information relevant to the subject matter of the protocol as the Secretary with the concurrence of the appropriate panel or panels ... may require; and (8) a requirement for submission of progress reports and, when completed, records of the trials conducted under the protocol, which records are adequate to show compliance with the protocol.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.