Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F. Supp. 2d 682 - McCuiston v. Hoffa

351 F. Supp. 2d 682 - McCuiston v. Hoffa’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 411

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · St. Amant v. Thompson · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · Burdick v. Takushi

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.