Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 Ill. App. 3d 684 - People v. Roberts

351 Ill. App. 3d 684 - People v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024

13 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 192 Ill. 2d 348 - People v. Simms · 202 Ill. 2d 189 - People v. Pollock · 170 Ill. App. 3d 873 - People v. Travis · 58 Ill. 2d 36 - People v. Ball · 261 Ill. App. 3d 894 - In Re FW

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he domestic battery statute refers to the definitions found in ‘subsection (3) of section 112A — 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.’ 720 ILCS 5/12 — 3.2(a)(1) (West 2002) (referring to 725 ILCS 5/112A — 3(3) (West 2002)). Subsection (1) of section 112A — 3 defines ‘abuse’ to ‘not include reasonable direction of a minor child by a parent or person in loco parentis.’ 725 ILCS 5/112A — 3(1) (West 2002).” Roberts, 351 Ill. App. 3d at 689 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`reasonable steps to discipline their children when necessary'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “). A parent who inflicts corporal punishment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.