Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 Mo. 769 - State Ex Rel. Gentry v. Becker

State Ex Rel. Gentry v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
11
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of Worcester (1972), Osborne v. Purdome (1951)

2 federal appellate · 55 state decisions — followed in 11 states

2601943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormick · Ex Parte Hernreich v. Quinn · State v. Weatherby · City of St. Louis v. Meintz · Leslie v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court has the inherent power to punish for contempt and if it has also the inherent power to appoint or request a lawyer, as an officer of the court, to represent it or the state in the prosecution of the contempt proceeding, that is all the power the court reasonably needs for its own protection and for the due administration of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “when a lawyer takes his license he takes it burdened with certain honorary obligations. He is a sworn minister of justice, and when commanded by the court he cannot withhold his services in cases prosecuted in forma pauperis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the general rule and the better reasoned view that “in the absence of statute providing therefor, an attorney who has been assigned by the court to defend an indigent accused cannot recover compensation therefor from the public” (Annotations 130 A.L.R. 1439 , 1440; 36 L.R.A., N.S., 377-383), either for trying the case or for appealing it. Annotation 100 A.L.R. 321 , 331.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.