State v. Nunn’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2010
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Vendo Co. · State v. Jones · State v. Pieschke · State v. Malaski · State v. Ruud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court has to submit a lesser offense only if it is a so-called lesser included offense and only if there is evidence that produces a rational basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the lesser offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jensen“[u]pon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jensen“[a]ggravated robbery requires the commission of a theft; if there were no theft the offense would be assault.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stanifer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.