Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 N.W.2d 409 - State v. Stitzel

State v. Stitzel’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Brouillette · State v. Corarito · State v. Rossbach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing we have said should be interpreted as disapproving a presumptive rule adopted by a court in the exercise of its supervisory powers which establishes a fixed time period within which cases must normally be brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.