State v. Jarnagin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"the nature of the violation, the amount of time between the violation and any later statements, whether the suspect remained in custody before making any later statements, subsequent events that may have dissipated the taint of the earlier violation, and the use that the state has made of the unwarned statements."”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Swan · 289 Or. App. 602 - State v. Hickman

2. “advis[ing the] defendant of his Miranda rights and then proceed[ing] to question him despite his repeated requests for counsel,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Swan · 295 Or. App. 636 - State v. Ward

3. “the officers failed to recognize that the circumstances had become sufficiently compelling to require Miranda warnings”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Swan · 296 Or. App. 278 - State v. Taylor