KC v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited
43 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Santosky v. Kramer · Troxel v. Granville · Meyer v. State of Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The party claiming an infringement of his right to due process has the burden of demonstrating both that he has a protected interest and that such interest has been affected in an impermissible way. The question is whether there has been a denial of fundamental fairness.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Booth v. Booth · DM v. State“[T]he process due at any given time must reflect the nature of the proceeding and the interests involved.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. [We] [g]ive considerable deference to the trial court’s determination because it has the advantage to judge the demeanor and intelligence of the witnesses; 2. [We] [e]xamine the evidence in the light most favorable to appellee and resolve all conflicts in evidence for appellee; [and] 3. [We] [a]ssume as true the evidence in appellee’s favor, disregard entirely appellant’s evidence in conflict with appellee’s evidence, and give to appellee’s evidence every favorable inference that may fairly be drawn.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.