Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 Pa. Super. 149 - Commonwealth v. Speaks

351 Pa. Super. 149 - Commonwealth v. Speaks’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 413 Pa. Super. 95 - Commonwealth v. Kennedy (1992), 371 Pa. Super. 315 - Commonwealth v. Delligatti (1988)

29 state decisions

2001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Nix v. Williams · North Carolina v. Butler · Lutwak v. United States · Commonwealth v. MacOlino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The problem is one that calls for balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual's right to prepare his defense. Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer's testimony and other relevant factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “permits the Commonwealth `to refrain from disclosing the identity of an informer' and `limits the prosecution's duty to make available to the defense the names and whereabouts of all material eyewitnesses.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.