Krauth v. First Continental Dev-Con, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 219 So. 2d 106 - Black v. Miller · 335 So. 2d 343 - Myrick v. Second National Bank of Clearwater · Bank of Hawthorne v. Shepherd · Blackstone Holding Co. v. Lawrence · Sacks v. Lytle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Fjirst ... appl[ies] to a court of proper jurisdiction for a ... charging order has priority for the full satisfaction of his judgment from the debtor’s partnership interest. Other judgment creditors achieve priority according to the sequence in which they apply for charging orders. There is no pro rata apportionment of the partnership interest, and it matters not when the judgments were entered nor what efforts may previously have been made to satisfy them by other means."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““(1) On due application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any judgment creditor of a limited partner, the court may charge the interest of the indebted limited partner with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the judgment debt; and it may appoint a receiver, and make al! other orders, directions, and inquiries which the circumstances of the case may require.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It ... seems logical that, in the absence of precedent or statute to the contrary, the method of apportioning payment to judgment creditors from a partnership interest should be parallel to the method of determining priority among judgment creditors seeking execution on other kinds of personal property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.