State v. Tillett’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2017
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Gilbert v. California · United States v. Dionisio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“; and the compulsion which makes a suspect or accused the source of”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“was based upon identification, and one of the two people who identified the accused * * * said that he did so on the basis of his forehead, his eyes, and his Spanish accent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Valentine“[t]he entire state case was based upon identification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.