Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 SO2D 210 - Dillman v. Nobles

Dillman v. Nobles’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2010

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

7019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 315 So. 2d 282 - Kavlich v. Kramer · 326 So. 2d 486 - Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. · King v. King · Keller v. Haas · Kingsman Enterprises, Inc. v. Bakerfield Elec. Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The owner, occupant, or person in charge of property owes an invitee ... [1] the duty of exercising reasonable or ordinary care for his safety and is liable for injury resulting from breach of such duty. This duty includes that of exercising reasonable care to keep the premises in a reasonable condition or of warning invitees ... of hidden or concealed perils of which he knows or should know in the exercise of reasonable care, so that those whom he has invited to enter upon or use his property shall not be unnecessarily or unreasonably exposed to danger." Foggin v. General Guaranty Ins. Co., 250 La. 347 , 195 So.2d 636 (1967). (Footnote 1 added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"It is well settled that where an individual forms a corporation of which he is the sole and only stock holder or owns such control of the stock that the act of the corporation is his own, then he may not use the screen of corporate entity to absolve himself from responsibility."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.