Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 SO2D 277 - Craft v. Trahan

Craft v. Trahan’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably 368 So. 2d 1030 - Credeur v. Luke (1979), 583 So. 2d 114 - Urbeso v. Bryan (1991)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1501977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kay v. Carter · 258 So. 2d 694 - Deville v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · 230 So. 2d 759 - Patrick v. Patrick · Automotive Finance Co. v. Kesk, Inc. · Downs v. Delco-Light Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An "agent" is defined as one who acts for or in the place of another, by authority from the latter. Downs v. Delco-Light Co., 175 La. 242 , 143 So. 227 (1932); Patrick v. Patrick, 230 So.2d 759 (La.App. 2 Cir.1970). An agency relationship may be created by the parties thereto either expressly or by implication. The essential test to be applied in determining whether an implied agency exists, is whether the principal has the right to control the conduct of the agent, and whether the agent has the right and authority to represent or bind the principal. LSA-C.C. arts. 2985, et seq.; Automotive Finance Co. v. Kesk, Inc., 200 So.2d 136 (La.App. 4 Cir.1967)."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.