Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

351 So. 2d 392

King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1977

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-11-04

Relies on 349 So. 2d 794 - Brooks v. State

Decided 1977-11-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra.The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., SCHEB, J., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
/351/so2d/392 · .json · Public domain