¶1Convictions for robbery and burglary. The prosecutor’s interrogation of the accused concerning a prior larceny charge was improper, there having been no conviction, and defense counsel’s objection was sustained. There was no request either for a mistrial or a curative instruction. No error on the part of the trial judge is therefore demonstrated. The interrogation is not shown to have deprived appellant of a fair trial.
¶2AFFIRMED.