Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 SW2D 27 - Johnson v. Duensing

Johnson v. Duensing’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 district · 6 state decisions

20196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Duensing · Hyde Park Amusement Co. v. Mogler · Johnson v. Duensing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... The board being in the position of trustee for the stockholders was in duty bound to act in the best interest of the corporation and the stockholders_ ‘The officers and directors of a corporation occupy a fiduciary relation to the corporation and to the stockholders; their position is one of trust and they are bound to act with fidelity and subordinate their personal interest to the interest of the corporation should there be a conflict.’ ” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.