Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 SW2D 46 - Bernstein v. Bernstein

Bernstein v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Beckmann v. Beckmann · Dorrance v. Dorrance · McCarty v. McCarty · Jones v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No petition for review of any judgment for divorce * * * shall be allowed, any law or statute to the contrary notwithstanding; but there may be a review of any order or judgment touching the alimony and maintenance of the wife, and the care, custody and maintenance of the .children, or any of them, as in other cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This being a proceeding in equity, we review the case de novo upon both the law and the evidence. We determine on the whole record what relief, if any, should be granted. McCarty v. McCarty, Mo., 300 S.W.2d 394, 399 ; Picadura v. Humphrey, Mo., 335 S.W.2d 6, 12 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * This statute has long been in effect in this state and is the fixed public policy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.