Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

351 S.W.3d 246

State v. Ater

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2011

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-10-25

Relies on State v. Washington

Decided 2011-10-25

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 David A. Ater appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20; 1 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

/351/sw3d/246 · .json · Public domain