Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 WIS2D 180 - State v. Mursal

State v. Mursal’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · State v. Gallion · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 217 Wis. 2d 392 - State v. Lechner · 198 Wis. 2d 207 - State v. Giebel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not alter the meaning of the warning in any way.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a) The trial court said "you 're not a citizen" instead of "you are not a citizen"; b) The trial court said "United States" instead of "United States of America"; c) The trial court said "can result" instead of "may result," and d) The trial court said "your plea" instead of "you are advised that a plea of guilty or no contest" and omitted "the offense with which you are charged" that would have followed "guilty or no contest."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"If you are not a citizen of the United States of America, you are advised that a plea of guilty or no contest for the offense with which you are charged may result in deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country or the denial of naturalization, under federal law."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.