In Re Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection · Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp. · Neufeld v. Freeman · Solomon v. Cosby · Costar Group, Incorporated v. Loopnet, Incorporated
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination of good faith is necessarily fact intensive and must be conducted on a case-by-case basis. The Court should consider the totality of the circumstances. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Wolf“The existence of a presumption means that if the movant comes forward with no evidence, the motion to extend must be denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Goodrich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.