James F. Armstrong v. Alec W. Brown and Lester J. Gendron

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

November 15, 1965.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-11-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1968

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Armstrong v. Rushing

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

James F. Armstrong, in pro. per.

Roy E. Wolfe, County Counsel, Medera County Gov. Center, Madera, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The order dismissing the complaint in this Civil Rights Act damage suit, without leave to amend, is reversed and remanded for the same reasons which have required reversal and remand of Armstrong v. Rushing, 9 Cir., 352 F.2d 836, decided today.