Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 F.2d 150 - Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.

Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

352 F.2d 150 · 1965

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Rowlett v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (1987), Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University (1979)

29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

1601965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood · Linkletter v. Walker · Simler v. Conner · Scott v. Neely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'strong and compelling reasons to the contrary.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right of trial by jury in the Federal courts cannot be dispensed with, except by the assent of the parties entitled to it and cannot be impaired by any blending with a claim, properly cognizable at law, of a demand for equitable relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We are of the opinion that the Chief Judge abused his discretion, if discretion he had under the existing circumstances, in denying a jury trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.