Case v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
352 F.2d 193 · 1965
Citation profile
51 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (1980), Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp. (1982)
51 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Miller v. Brazel · Century Refining Company v. Charles T. Hall, Charles T. Hall, Cross-Appellant v. Century Refining Company, Cross-Appellee · Globe Cereal Mills v. Scrivener
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“they ought to be adhered to in the absence of some good and sufficient reason.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“definitive pre-trial order reflecting the agreement of the parties, having been entered into after full discovery, must, of course, control the subsequent course of the action. F.R.Civ.P. 16(6).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'The office [of the pretrial order] as a procedural tool [is] to insure the economical and efficient trial of every case on its merits without chance or surprise.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.