Vess v. Peyton’s Empirical Analysis
352 F.2d 325 · 1965
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably Coles v. Peyton (1968), State v. Lee (1984)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Snyder v. Commonwealth · DeToro v. Pepersack · Ward v. Peyton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * [T]he preliminary hearing in Virginia is not a critical stage of the proceedings, and Vess was not prejudiced by the absence of counsel at this point since no substantive rights were forfeited. Ward v. Peyton, 349 F. 2d 359 (4 Cir.1965); DeToro v. Pepersack, 332 F. 2d 341 (4 Cir.1964); see Snyder v. Commonwealth, 202 Va. 1009 , 121 S.E. 2d 452 (1961).” 352 F. 2d at p. 326 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peyton v. Ellyson · State v. Olsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.