Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 F.3d 1142 - Hill v. Potter

Hill v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

352 F.3d 1142 · 2003

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
May 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co. (2005), Dale v. Lappin (2004)

23 federal appellate ·

310200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Brown v. General Services Administration · United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co. · Walker v. Thompson · Ray v. Kertes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test for finality is not whether the suit is dismissed with prejudice or without prejudice, on the merits or on a jurisdictional ground or on a procedural ground .... The test is whether the district court has finished with the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.