Riley v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis
352 F.3d 1313 · 2003
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably Horton v. Allen (2004), Juan v. Allen III (2005)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · Clark v. Murphy · 95 Wash. 2d 385 - State v. Theroff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unreasonable application of federal law if the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle ... but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“applies controlling law to a set of facts that is materially indistinguishable from a Supreme Court decision but nevertheless reaches a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.