Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 F.3d 382 - Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of Justice

Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of Justice’s Empirical Analysis

352 F.3d 382 · 2003

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Morissette v. United States · Kolender v. Lawson · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to designate an organization as a foreign terrorist organization ... if the Secretary finds that (A) the organization is a foreign organization; (B) the organization engages in terrorist activity ...; and (C) the terrorist activity or terrorism of the organization threatens the security of United States nationals or the national security of the United States.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the donor had knowledge that the organization was designated by the Secretary as a[FTO] or that the donor had knowledge of the organization's unlawful activities that caused it to be so designated”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.