Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 F.3d 422 - Stewart v. Ashcroft

Stewart v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

352 F.3d 422 · 2003

Citation profile

224
cited by 224 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 172 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 224 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Holcomb v. Powell (2006), Czekalski v. Peters (2007)

31 federal appellate · 172 district ·

1270200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center · Regina C. Brown, v. Kenneth D. Brody, Chairman, Export-Import Bank of the United States,

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 224 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “experiences materially adverse consequences affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or future employment opportunities such that a reasonable trier of fact could find objectively tangible harm.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Stewart’s pointing to differences in qualifications that merely indicate a “close call” does not get him beyond summary judgment. This Court will not reexamine governmental promotion decisions where it appears the Government was faced with a difficult decision between two qualified candidates, particularly when there is no other evidence that race played a part in the decision.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reassignment with significantly different responsibilities.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.