In Re: Aquatic Development Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
352 F.3d 671 · 2003
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105
Relies on Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative · Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc. · United States v. Sutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his Court has repeatedly cautioned that 105(a) 'does not”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[i]t is axiomatic that bankruptcy courts are 'courts of equity, empowered to invoke equitable principles to achieve fairness and justice in the reorganization process.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“as (i) a decision rest[ing] on an error of law (such as application of the wrong legal principle) or a clearly erroneous factual finding,' or (ii) a decision that, 'though not necessarily the product of a legal error or a clearly erroneous factual finding[,] cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions' ” (quoting Zervos v. Verizon N.Y., Inc., 252 F.3d 163 , 169 (2d Cir.2001))). See also In re Blaise, 219 B.R. 946, 950 (2d Cir. BAP 1998) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.