352 Ill. App. 3d 195 - People v. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 66 Ill. 2d 551 - People v. King · 189 Ill. 2d 99 - People v. Blue · 168 Ill. 2d 107 - People v. Arna · 196 Ill. 2d 425 - People v. Sorenson · 203 Ill. 2d 335 - People v. Crespo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We recognize that the prosecutor may have indicated in the opening and closing statements that separate offenses occurred over a period of time. The jury instructions may also have indicated that the State was seeking convictions for eight separate acts. However, the alleged notice was insufficient because it was not prior to trial and therefore does not satisfy Crespo.” 352 Ill. App. 3d at 212 . The State argues before this court that Crespo’s hold-”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.