352 Ill. App. 3d 73 - People v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 366 Ill. App. 3d 770 - People v. Sullivan (2006), 358 Ill. App. 3d 512 - People v. Howell (2005)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 106 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Collins · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 185 Ill. 2d 532 - People v. Smith · 141 Ill. 2d 40 - People v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trier of fact is free to accept or reject 'as much or as little' of a witness's testimony as it likes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The previous inconsistent statements alone were sufficient to prove defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.... It is the jury’s decision to assign weight to the statement and to decide if the statement was indeed voluntary, after hearing the declarant’s inconsistent testimony. Once a jury or trial court has chosen to return a guilty verdict based upon a prior inconsistent statement, a reviewing court not only is under no obligation to determine whether the declarant’s testimony was substantially corroborated or clear and convincing, but it may not engage in any such analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he jury obviously found [the State's primary witness's] pretrial statement and grand jury testimony implicating defendant more credible than her trial testimony, and we will not substitute our judgment therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.