Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 Mo. 122 - Lambus v. Kaiser

Lambus v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2014

21 state decisions

10019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Counselman v. Hitchcock · Goldsby v. United States · State v. Ferguson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The magistrate before whom an accused is brought shall advise the accused of the charge against him * * *. The accused shall be allowed a reasonable time to advise with his counsel and shall be permitted to send for counsel if he so desires. * * * The accused may cross-examine witnesses, against him * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * "* * * If he had had counsel at the time, by statute the magistrate would have been required to call them if requested * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.