Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 Mo. 379 - State v. Hogan

State v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 1978 · most notably State v. Castino (1954), State v. Smith (1946)

34 state decisions

1201944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Duncan · Burnam v. Chicago Great Western Railroad · Woelfle v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance · State v. Drummins · Crabtree v. Kurn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`We held in the case of State v. Bowen, 263 Mo. [279] loc. cit. 280, 172 S.W. 367 , that it is not sufficient to warrant a party who puts a witness on the stand, in impeaching such witness . . ., that the witness merely fails or refuses to tell the facts which he had theretofore related extrajudicially or fails to tell all such facts, but in order to warrant impeachment in the mode stated, the witness must go further, and by relating wholly contradictory facts become in effect a witness for the adverse side. In the latter event the party calling the witness is entitled to show that he was misled and entrapped by the witness' former words and attitude into calling the adverse witness.. . .' State v. Drummins, 274 Mo. 632 , 204 S.W. 271 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.