352 N.J. Super. 178 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Calandra · United States v. Williams · State v. Weleck · State v. Scherzer · United States v. Ciambrone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Clearly exculpatory” evidence ... must carry [its own] indicia of reliability ... [so that it] is capable of complete consideration by the grand jury without the need of any extrinsic information also being supplied. “Clearly exculpatory” evidence is also evidence which does not require the grand jurors to engage in any extensive weighing of credibility factors that could substantially affect the value of the evidence. Any evidence that requires such a process would serve to alter the well-recognized function of the grand jury, transforming it from an accusative [body] to an adjudicative ... body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cameron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.