Holmquist v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 1990
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Trail v. Christian · Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity · 140 N.J. Super. 212 - Linn v. Rand · Zerby v. Warren · Ross v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every * * * person who is injured * * * by an intoxicated person or by the intoxication of any person has a right of action * * * against any person who, by illegally selling or bartering intoxicating liquors, caused the intoxication of that person * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meany v. Newell“Imposing civil liability discourages the illegal' furnishing of liquor to minors; thus, it serves to promote our strong public policy of preventing our youth from causing senseless damage to themselves and the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holmquist v. Miller““Any person” who sells or barters liquor means a person in the business of providing liquor, and not a social host who happehs to receive some consideration from his guests in return for drinks he provides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meany v. Newell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.