Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 OR 428 - Burke v. State

Burke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To say that 'or' is 'disjunctive' is true enough. But authorities agree that a disjunctive connector can have either an 'inclusive' or an 'exclusive' sense. Thus, 'A or B' can mean one or the other, but not both. But it can also mean one or the other, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(citing Bryan A. Garner, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage 624 (2d ed. 1995) ); DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Chipotle Mex. Grill, Inc. , 2015 WL 164072 , at (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2015) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it has been asserted that, in legal drafting, it is more often the case that the connective 'or' is used in the inclusive sense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.