State v. Pitt’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “when speaking to a police officer. Defendant argues that the evidence should have been excluded under OEC 403 1 because its probative value to the charge of resisting arrest was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. We affirm. 2 We review a trial court's evidentiary ruling”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 829 - State v. Lipka

2. “[A] motion in limine is preferred because, if counsel must wait to make an objection and receive a ruling in front of the jury, the client could be prejudiced even though the ruling was in the client's favor.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Sperou

3. “This court previously has recognized that a defendant properly may assign as error the denial of a pretrial motion in limine to exclude arguably irrelevant or prejudicial evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Sperou