Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 S.C. 62 - State v. Khingratsaiphon

State v. Khingratsaiphon’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Baccus (2006), State v. Freiburger (2005)

43 state decisions

280200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Ybarra v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A police officer may stop and briefly detain and question a person for investigative purposes, without treading upon his Fourth Amendment rights, when the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts, short of probable cause for arrest, that the person is involved in criminal activity. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 [ 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] (1968). “Reasonable suspicion” requires a “particularized and objective basis that would lead one to suspect another of criminal activity.” United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 [ 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 ] (1981). In determining whether reasonable suspicion exists, “the totality of the circumstances — the whole picture — ” must be considered. Id. at 417 [ 101 S.Ct. 690 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. Evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded from trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not hold the appellate court may not conduct its own review of the record to determine whether the trial judge's decision is supported by the evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.