Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 SO2D 500 - Hopson v. State

Hopson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1997

16 state decisions

100197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Smith v. Hooey · Dickey v. Florida · Moore v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(I)f facts are presented from which the jury may reasonably infer that the crime has been committed, although established by circumstantial evidence, the question must be submitted to the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . Mr. Eugene Phillips, Supervisor of Inmate Classification and Movement, Department of Correctional Services, State Campus, Albany, New York.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “did not show that he was prejudiced in any manner”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.