¶1The orders revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him to two consecutive ten year terms are affirmed, but these cases are remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentences do not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentences is improper. Brooks v. State, supra.The appellant does not have to be present at re-sentencing.
352 So. 2d 936
Hall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 7, 1977
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-12-07
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1980
1 state decisions
Relies on 349 So. 2d 794 - Brooks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-12-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →