Gross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 183rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Brooks v. State · Sharp v. State · Wesbrook v. State · Clayton v. State · Matson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Did the court of appeals err in its sufficiency-of-the-evidence review by utilizing a divide-and-conquer approach rather than viewing all the evidence collectively and allowing for the jury’s ability to draw reasonable inferences therefrom? (2) Is the evidence of appellant’s intent sufficient to support his conviction under the law of parties?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Gross v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.