Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 352 U.S. 432 - Breithaupt v. Abram

Breithaupt v. Abram’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

1,305
cited by 1,305 later decisions
46
cited 46 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

218 federal appellate · 39 district · 818 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,305 later decisions (46 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably Schmerber v. State of California (1966), County of Sacramento v. Lewis (1998)

218 federal appellate · 39 district · 818 state decisions — followed in 46 states

248019571960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rochin v. People of California · Weeks v. United States · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Brown v. State of Mississippi

Cited together with Schmerber v. State of California · Rochin v. People of California · Mapp v. Ohio · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Winston v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,305 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The increasing slaughter on our highways, most of which should be avoidable, now reaches the astounding figures only heard of on the battlefield”
    53 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We set aside the conviction because such conduct 'shocked the conscience' and was so 'brutal' and 'offensive' that it did not comport with traditional ideas of fair play and decency.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is nothing 'brutal' or 'offensive' in the taking of a sample of blood when done ... under the protective eye of a physician.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.