Abramson v. Eldridge’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Milburn · Criswell v. Holliday
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the notice of appeal was not filed timely for the December 16, 2002, order, it was timely filed for the December 30, 2002, order regarding attorney’s fees. There were no references to the December 16 order in the December 30 order, so it is not necessary to review the December 16 order in determining the propriety of the December 30 order. Criswell v. Holiday, 330 Ark. 762 , 957 S.W.2d 181 (1997). The writ of certiorari is granted with specific instructions that the court would only review the correctness of the attorney’s fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eldridge v. Abramson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.