Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

353 Ark. 653

Valenzuela v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 2003

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2003-06-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Appellant Jose Valenzuela, by and through his attorney, Ralph J. Blagg, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Attorney Blagg states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

¶2 We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

¶3The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Corbin, J., not participating.
/353/ark/653 · .json · Public domain